Welcome!

Partners in Research App_182x61

Welcome to Partners in Research! A community where you can share your health-related research interests as a patient, researcher or healthcare advocate.

Everyone in the stakeholder community--especially patients, caregivers, and their clinicians--are vital to developing research that empowers patients and their families.

Join Us Log In

 
drkirkwood

Aug 14, 2014 by @drkirkwood · View  

Summary from a very large CDC study on diabetes. Longer life-spans are definitely complicating the picture.

"The ongoing diabetes and obesity epidemics have combined with ever-increasing human lifespans to increase lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes to about 40 percent for both men and women, said lead study author Edward Gregg, chief of the epidemiology and statistics branch in the division of diabetes translation at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention"

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_147820.html

drkirkwood

Dr. Kirkwood responded Aug 15, 2014 · View

Totally agreed, @jackie_g. Definitely share this research with your colleagues.

frank_r

Frank responded Oct 13, 2016 · View

I was surprised by this figure as well.

Login here to comment.
community

Aug 29, 2016 by @community in Research Advocates · View  

This is the latest research report about standards.Staff Engagement

This is the latest research report about standards.

Staff Engagement

Login here to comment.
community

Aug 17, 2016 by @community · View  

What about #community

Login here to comment.
community

Aug 17, 2016 by @community · View  

Hmmm #best_practices

Login here to comment.
community

Aug 17, 2016 by @community · View  

Now what if I add the hashtag #Best -Practices

Login here to comment.
RSS NIH
  • Outcomes of Amended (“A1”) Applications March 23, 2017
    In a previous blog, we described the outcomes of grant applications according to the initial peer review score. Some of you have wondered about the peer review scores of amended (“A1”) applications. More specifically, some of you have asked about … Continue reading →
  • Mid-career Investigators and Shifting Demographics of NIH Grant Recipients March 6, 2017
    While NIH policies focus on early stage investigators, we also recognize that it is in our interest to make sure that we continue to support outstanding scientists at all stages of their career. Many of us have heard mid-career investigators express concerns about difficulties staying funded. In a 2016 blog post we looked at data […]
  • Meet NIH & HHS in New Orleans for the NIH Regional Seminar, May 3-5! March 3, 2017
    Do you remember walking into the person’s office down the hall from you when you needed to ask a question, instead of “popping” them an email, instant message, or text? There’s no disputing that the digital age definitely has its advantages - making information sharing faster, cheaper, and more convenient, and allowing us to communicate […]
  • Resubmissions Revisited: Funded Resubmission Applications and Their Initial Peer Review Scores February 17, 2017
    “My first submission got an overall impact score of 30. Is that good enough? What’s the likelihood I’ll eventually get this funded?”, or, “My first submission was not even discussed. Now what? Does anyone with an undiscussed grant bother to … Continue reading →
  • Following up on the Research Commitment Index as a Tool to Describe Grant Support February 15, 2017
    Many thanks for your terrific questions and comments to last month’s post, Research Commitment Index: A New Tool for Describing Grant Support. I’d like to use this opportunity to address a couple of key points brought up by a number of commenters; in later blogs, we’ll focus on other suggestions. The two points I’d like […]